Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality

Yichen Cui; Zengkui Wan; Qi Xia; Yonghui Feng; Wentai Gu; Lu Yang; Zhenzhong Zhou

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality

Yichen Cui, Zengkui Wan, Qi Xia, Yonghui Feng, Wentai Gu, Lu Yang, Zhenzhong Zhou

Published in American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 9 December 2020 Accepted: 11 January 2021 Published: 22 January 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

When judging others, individuals often unconsciously apply their own special knowledge and personal constructs about human beings, which eventually forms some implicit theories of personality (ITPs). On the basis of different implicit personality theories, these individuals thus divided into two categories: a type of people believe that personality attributes or traits are sequestration, namely entity theorists; another type of people believe that personality attributes or characteristics are gradient, i.e. incremental theorists. Unlike studies that focus on how personality traits interact, implicit personality theory explores people’s beliefs about the fixity and plasticity of personality traits. Based on projective techniques, a fairy tale situation test is developed to explore whether the implicit personality theories of college students have consistency across different personal attributes (such as characteristic or ability), as well as whether entity theory and incremental theory are two dimensions or two poles of the same dimension. The result of the pretest shows that the compiled fairy tale situation test could be a measurement to analyse the universality of implicit personality theory and the structural pattern of its dimension. A formal test separated the implicit personality theories of 120 college students. The results of both the pretest and the formal test indicated that (a) college students had a common and consistent implicit theory across five personal attributes including character, ability, temperament, morality, and emotion and that (b) entity theory and incremental theory were two inverse poles of the same dimension in implicit theories of personality. These results show that Implicit Theories of Personality has the characteristics of two dimensions (entity theory vs. gradient theory).

Published in	American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
Page(s)	172-181
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Implicit Theories of Personality, Entity Theory, Incremental Theory, Projective Test, Fairy Tale Situation Test

References

[1]	Barsky, A. P., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Disentangling sunk-costs and completion proximity: The role of regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.006.
[2]	Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139 (3), 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531.
[3]	Plaks, J, E., & Halvorson, H. G. (2013). Does accountability attenuate or amplify stereotyping? The role of implicit theories. Social Cognition, 31 (5), 543–561. doi: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.543.
[4]	Reinhard, M. A., Sporer, S. L., Scharmach, M., & Marksteiner, T. (2011). Listening, not watching: Situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 467–484. doi: 10.1037/a0023726.
[5]	Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2011). A theory of impulse and reflection. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 97–117). London: Sage.
[6]	Park, D., & Kim, S. (2015). Time to move on? when entity theorists perform better than incremental theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 736–748. doi: 10.1177/0146167215578028
[7]	Yeager, D. S., Lee, H. Y., & Jamieson, J. P. (2016). How to improve adolescent stress responses: Insights from integrating implicit theories of personality and biopsychosocial models. Psychological Science, 27 (8), 1078–1091. doi: 10.1177/0956797616649604.
[8]	Double, K. S., & Birney, D. P. (2016). The effects of personality and metacognitive beliefs on cognitive training adherence and performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.101.
[9]	Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 230–241. doi: 10.1037/a0034553.
[10]	Ziegler, A., Fidelman, M., Reutlinger, M., et al. (2010). Implicit personality theories on the modifiability and stability of the action repertoire as a meaningful framework for individual motivation: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Study, 21, 147–163. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.528924.
[11]	Leith, S. A., Ward, C. L. P., Giacomin, M., Landau, E. S., Ehrlinger, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2014). Changing theories of change: Strategic shifting in implicit theory endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (4), 597–620. doi: 10.1037/a0037699.
[12]	Yin, C. Y., Yu, H. Y., & Poon, P. (2016). Consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in product-harm crises: The role of implicit theories of personality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15, 87–95. doi: 10.1002/cb.1549.
[13]	Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21 (7), 952–959. doi: 10.1177/0956797610374740.
[14]	Plaks, J. E., & Chasteen, A. L. (2013). Entity versus incremental theories predict older adults’ memory performance. Psychology and Aging, 28 (4), 948–957. doi: 10.1037/a0034348.
[15]	Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (8), 437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010.
[16]	Baig, L., Violato, C., & Crutcher, R. (2010). A construct validity study of clinical competence: A multitrait multimethod matrix approach. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30, 19–25. doi: doi.org/10.1002/chp.20052.
[17]	Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2012). Capitalizing on brand personalities in advertising: The influence of implicit self-theories of ad appeal effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.004.
[18]	Yorkston, E. A., Nunes, J. C., & Matta, S. (2010). The malleable brand: The role of implicit theories in brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 74, 80–93. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.1.80.
[19]	Yeager, D. S. (2017). Dealing with social difficulty during adolescence: The role of implicit theories of personality. Child Development Perspectives, 11 (3), 196–201. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12234.
[20]	Mathur, P., Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2012). Consumers’ implicit theories about personality influence their brand personality judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 545–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.01.005.
[21]	Critcher, C. R., Dunning D., & Rom S. C. (2015). Causal trait theories: a new form of person knowledge that explains egocentric pattern projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 (3), 400–416. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000019.
[22]	Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14 (2), 227–234. doi: 10.1037/a0035490.
[23]	Xu, P., Xiong, J., & Fan, J. Y. The Impulse process of language structure parts’ speech flow. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2013, 32 (4): 685-698. doi: 10.13860/j.cnki.slt j.2013.04.010.
[24]	Hoyt, C. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2013). Gender bias in leader evaluations: Merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (10), 1306–1319. doi: 10.1177/0146167213493643.
[25]	Wendy, W. (2017). Habit in Personality and Social Psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21 (4), 389–403. doi: 10.1177/1088868317720362.
[26]	Satchell, L., Hoskins, S., Corr, P., & Moore, R. (2017). Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: Personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence. Personality and Individual Differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.025.
[27]	Kast, V. (2001). Abschied von der Opferrolle. Freiburg: Herder.
[28]	Rutledge, E. L., Crouch, J. L., Valentiner, D. P., Davila, A. L., Milner, J. S., & Skowronski, J. J. (2018). Are implicit personality theories associated with parental reactions to child transgressions? Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.021.
[29]	Goddard, M. J. (2018). Extending B. F. Skinner’s selection by consequences to personality change, implicit theories of intelligence, skill learning, and language. Review of General Psychology, 22 (4), 421–426. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000168.
[30]	Cripps, E., Wood, R. E., Beckmann, N., Lau, J., Beckmann, J. F., & Cripps, S. A. (2016). Bayesian Analysis of Individual Level Personality Dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01065.
[31]	Steimer, A., & Mata, A. (2016). Motivated implicit theories of personality: My weaknesses will go away, but my strengths are here to stay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (4), 415–429. doi: 10.1177/0146167216629437.
[32]	Sheketera, A. A., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2015). Features of Formation of Implicit Theories and their Relation to Students’ Intellectual and Personal Potential. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 372-376. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.080.
[33]	Liat, L., Ora, Nakash., & Shai D. (2019). It takes two to self-disclose: Incremental theorists facilitate others’ self-disclosure more than do entity theorists. Journal of Personality, 87 (6), 1264–1276. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12473.
[34]	Friedman, R. A., Pinkley, R. L., Bottom, W. P., Liu, W., & Gelfand, M. (2019). Implicit Theories of Negotiation: Developing a Measure of Agreement Fluidity. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13 (2), 127–150. doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12166.
[35]	Jędrzejczyk, J., & Zajenkowski, M. (2020). Who Believes in Nonlimited Willpower? In Search of Correlates of Implicit Theories of Self-Control. Psychological Reports, 123 (2), 281–299. doi: 10.1177/0033294118809936.
[36]	Lee, Y. H., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Adolescents with an entity theory of personality are more vigilant to social status and use relational aggression to maintain social status. Social Development, 29 (1), 273–289. doi: 10.1111/sode.12393.
[37]	Sutu, A., Serrano, S., Schultz, L. H., Jackson, J. J., & Damian, R. I. (2020). Creating through deviancy or adjustment? The link between personality profile normativeness and creativity. European Journal of Personality, 33 (5), 565–588. doi: 10.1002/per.2215.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yichen Cui, Zengkui Wan, Qi Xia, Yonghui Feng, Wentai Gu, et al. (2021). Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 9(6), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yichen Cui; Zengkui Wan; Qi Xia; Yonghui Feng; Wentai Gu, et al. Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 9(6), 172-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yichen Cui, Zengkui Wan, Qi Xia, Yonghui Feng, Wentai Gu, et al. Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. Am J Appl Psychol. 2021;9(6):172-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15,
  author = {Yichen Cui and Zengkui Wan and Qi Xia and Yonghui Feng and Wentai Gu and Lu Yang and Zhenzhong Zhou},
  title = {Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {172-181},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20200906.15},
  abstract = {When judging others, individuals often unconsciously apply their own special knowledge and personal constructs about human beings, which eventually forms some implicit theories of personality (ITPs). On the basis of different implicit personality theories, these individuals thus divided into two categories: a type of people believe that personality attributes or traits are sequestration, namely entity theorists; another type of people believe that personality attributes or characteristics are gradient, i.e. incremental theorists. Unlike studies that focus on how personality traits interact, implicit personality theory explores people’s beliefs about the fixity and plasticity of personality traits. Based on projective techniques, a fairy tale situation test is developed to explore whether the implicit personality theories of college students have consistency across different personal attributes (such as characteristic or ability), as well as whether entity theory and incremental theory are two dimensions or two poles of the same dimension. The result of the pretest shows that the compiled fairy tale situation test could be a measurement to analyse the universality of implicit personality theory and the structural pattern of its dimension. A formal test separated the implicit personality theories of 120 college students. The results of both the pretest and the formal test indicated that (a) college students had a common and consistent implicit theory across five personal attributes including character, ability, temperament, morality, and emotion and that (b) entity theory and incremental theory were two inverse poles of the same dimension in implicit theories of personality. These results show that Implicit Theories of Personality has the characteristics of two dimensions (entity theory vs. gradient theory).},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality
AU  - Yichen Cui
AU  - Zengkui Wan
AU  - Qi Xia
AU  - Yonghui Feng
AU  - Wentai Gu
AU  - Lu Yang
AU  - Zhenzhong Zhou
Y1  - 2021/01/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
T2  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JF  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JO  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
SP  - 172
EP  - 181
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5672
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
AB  - When judging others, individuals often unconsciously apply their own special knowledge and personal constructs about human beings, which eventually forms some implicit theories of personality (ITPs). On the basis of different implicit personality theories, these individuals thus divided into two categories: a type of people believe that personality attributes or traits are sequestration, namely entity theorists; another type of people believe that personality attributes or characteristics are gradient, i.e. incremental theorists. Unlike studies that focus on how personality traits interact, implicit personality theory explores people’s beliefs about the fixity and plasticity of personality traits. Based on projective techniques, a fairy tale situation test is developed to explore whether the implicit personality theories of college students have consistency across different personal attributes (such as characteristic or ability), as well as whether entity theory and incremental theory are two dimensions or two poles of the same dimension. The result of the pretest shows that the compiled fairy tale situation test could be a measurement to analyse the universality of implicit personality theory and the structural pattern of its dimension. A formal test separated the implicit personality theories of 120 college students. The results of both the pretest and the formal test indicated that (a) college students had a common and consistent implicit theory across five personal attributes including character, ability, temperament, morality, and emotion and that (b) entity theory and incremental theory were two inverse poles of the same dimension in implicit theories of personality. These results show that Implicit Theories of Personality has the characteristics of two dimensions (entity theory vs. gradient theory).
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yichen Cui

Nanjing Institute of Juvenile Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
Zengkui Wan

Nanjing Institute of Juvenile Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
Qi Xia

Department of Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Yangzhou Technical Vocational College, Yangzhou, China
Yonghui Feng

School of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
Wentai Gu

Institute of Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
Lu Yang

Institute of Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
Zhenzhong Zhou

Nanjing Institute of Juvenile Mental Health, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yichen Cui, Zengkui Wan, Qi Xia, Yonghui Feng, Wentai Gu, et al. (2021). Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 9(6), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yichen Cui; Zengkui Wan; Qi Xia; Yonghui Feng; Wentai Gu, et al. Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 9(6), 172-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yichen Cui, Zengkui Wan, Qi Xia, Yonghui Feng, Wentai Gu, et al. Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality. Am J Appl Psychol. 2021;9(6):172-181. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15,
  author = {Yichen Cui and Zengkui Wan and Qi Xia and Yonghui Feng and Wentai Gu and Lu Yang and Zhenzhong Zhou},
  title = {Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {172-181},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20200906.15},
  abstract = {When judging others, individuals often unconsciously apply their own special knowledge and personal constructs about human beings, which eventually forms some implicit theories of personality (ITPs). On the basis of different implicit personality theories, these individuals thus divided into two categories: a type of people believe that personality attributes or traits are sequestration, namely entity theorists; another type of people believe that personality attributes or characteristics are gradient, i.e. incremental theorists. Unlike studies that focus on how personality traits interact, implicit personality theory explores people’s beliefs about the fixity and plasticity of personality traits. Based on projective techniques, a fairy tale situation test is developed to explore whether the implicit personality theories of college students have consistency across different personal attributes (such as characteristic or ability), as well as whether entity theory and incremental theory are two dimensions or two poles of the same dimension. The result of the pretest shows that the compiled fairy tale situation test could be a measurement to analyse the universality of implicit personality theory and the structural pattern of its dimension. A formal test separated the implicit personality theories of 120 college students. The results of both the pretest and the formal test indicated that (a) college students had a common and consistent implicit theory across five personal attributes including character, ability, temperament, morality, and emotion and that (b) entity theory and incremental theory were two inverse poles of the same dimension in implicit theories of personality. These results show that Implicit Theories of Personality has the characteristics of two dimensions (entity theory vs. gradient theory).},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Fairy Tale Situation Test for Implicit Theories of Personality
AU  - Yichen Cui
AU  - Zengkui Wan
AU  - Qi Xia
AU  - Yonghui Feng
AU  - Wentai Gu
AU  - Lu Yang
AU  - Zhenzhong Zhou
Y1  - 2021/01/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
T2  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JF  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JO  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
SP  - 172
EP  - 181
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5672
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20200906.15
AB  - When judging others, individuals often unconsciously apply their own special knowledge and personal constructs about human beings, which eventually forms some implicit theories of personality (ITPs). On the basis of different implicit personality theories, these individuals thus divided into two categories: a type of people believe that personality attributes or traits are sequestration, namely entity theorists; another type of people believe that personality attributes or characteristics are gradient, i.e. incremental theorists. Unlike studies that focus on how personality traits interact, implicit personality theory explores people’s beliefs about the fixity and plasticity of personality traits. Based on projective techniques, a fairy tale situation test is developed to explore whether the implicit personality theories of college students have consistency across different personal attributes (such as characteristic or ability), as well as whether entity theory and incremental theory are two dimensions or two poles of the same dimension. The result of the pretest shows that the compiled fairy tale situation test could be a measurement to analyse the universality of implicit personality theory and the structural pattern of its dimension. A formal test separated the implicit personality theories of 120 college students. The results of both the pretest and the formal test indicated that (a) college students had a common and consistent implicit theory across five personal attributes including character, ability, temperament, morality, and emotion and that (b) entity theory and incremental theory were two inverse poles of the same dimension in implicit theories of personality. These results show that Implicit Theories of Personality has the characteristics of two dimensions (entity theory vs. gradient theory).
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download