Peak runoff determination is one of the most important studies for the design of hydraulic structures which is used for different purposes like irrigation, water supplies, hydropower, and bridge structure. The amount of runoff produced and rainfall received determine the development of water resources in any region. The purpose of hydrologic design is to estimate the maximum, average, or minimum flood that the structure is expected to handle. Hydrological analysis has been conducted based on 33 years of maximum daily rainfall data. An important step in the analysis of rainfall occurrence is to choose an appropriate distribution to represent the depth of rainfall to study rainfall. Nekemte meteorological station was used for maximum rainfall estimation by gumbles distribution method of 50 & 100 years return period which is 132 & 142mm; while for generation of peak runoff by using soil conservation service (SCS) method which is 238 & 263m3/s respectively for Basaka sub-watershed. Conversely, the SCS method is recommended to estimate the ordinate required for the development of peak runoff hydrograph in the river sub-watershed because it utilized additional morphometric parameters such as watershed slope and the curve number (CN) which is a function of the properties of the soil and vegetation cover of the watershed. Basaka sub-watershed delineation analysis was done by GIS 10.8 and it covers a drainage area of about 58km2.
Published in | Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science (Volume 12, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11 |
Page(s) | 23-30 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
SCS, Gumbel, Basaka Sub-Watershed, Peak Runoff, Maximum Rainfall
[1] | A. Balasubramanian And D. Nagaraju, “Hydrology And Its Branches,” Res. Gate, No. March, Pp. 1–9, 2017, Doi: 10.13140/Rg.2.2.12676.53123. |
[2] | C. R. Shah, “Engineering Hydrology Assignment Work,” No. June, 2017, Doi: 10.13140/Rg.2.2.11562.82885. |
[3] | B. Dar, “Engineering Hydrology.,” 2017, Doi: 10.1201/9780429094811-13. |
[4] | G. K. Ebissa, “Hydrological Analysis And Peak Discharge Determination,” Vol. 14, No. 3, Pp. 33–48, 2017, Doi: 10.9790/1684-1403053348. |
[5] | E. Abel, “Investigation Of Causes Of Diversion Weir Failure (A Case Study On Marza Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme, South Gondar, Ethiopia),” 2021. |
[6] | B. Sisay, “Assessment Of Design Practices And Performance Of Small-Scale Diversion Weirs Constructed For Irrigation Project (A Case Study Of Ashar And Upper Kuashini Small-Scale Irrigation Schemes In Awi Zone, Dangla Woreda),” 2022. |
[7] | S. G. And C. R. S. G Arvind, P Ashok Kumar, “Statistical Analysis Of 30 Years Rainfall Data.: A Case Study Of Musiri,” J. Earth Environ. Sci., 2017. |
[8] | M. S. Regasa And M. Nones, “Swat Model-Based Quantification Of The Impact Of Land Use Land Cover Change On Sediment Yield In The Fincha Watershed, Ethiopia,” Front. Environ. Sci., Vol. 11, No. September, Pp. 1–15, 2023, Doi: 10.3389/Fenvs.2023.1146346. |
[9] | F. Gurmecha, “(Aastu) Diversion Weir Design Project (Asher River) Approval Page Members Of The Examining Board:,” No. May, 2017. |
[10] | B. Belango, “Performance Evaluation Of Diversion Headwork Structures For Irrigation: Case Study On Agega-1, Agega-2 And Sana Irrigation Schemes In Kembata Tembaro Zone, Snnpr, Ethiopia,” 2021. |
[11] | K. Dereje, “Performance Evaluation Of Tibila Irrigation Based Development Project Diversion Headwork, Ethiopia,” 2017. |
[12] | V. Te Chow, “Applied Hydrology,” 1988. |
[13] | K. Subramanya, “Engineering Hydrology. Mcgraw-Hill,” 2008. |
[14] | F. Gudeta, “Gezani Diversion Small Scale Irrigation Project,” 2016. |
[15] | G. Mosisa, “Prediction Of Consecutive Days Maximum Rainfall Using Frequency Analysis For Nekemte Town, Oromia, Ethiopia,” Vol. 12, No. 1, Pp. 12–22, 2023, Doi: 110.11648/J.Wros.20231201.12. |
[16] | K. Subramanya, “Engineering Hydrology. Chapter 7, Mcgraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New Delhi,” 2009. |
[17] | T. Ephrem, “Flood Embankment Design, Operation And Maintenance Manual In Ethiopia,” 2010. |
[18] | D. K. Subramanya, Engineering Hydrology, Fourth Eddition. 2008. |
[19] | S. Mason, A. Kruczkiewicz, P. Ceccato, And A. Crawford, “Using Climate Data And Information In,” No. May, 2015. |
[20] | A. Endalew, ““Investigation Of Causes Of Diversion Weir Failure (A Case Study On Marza Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme, South Gondar, Ethiopia),” 2021. |
[21] | S. Getahun, “Assessment On Causes Of Failure Of Irrigation Canals And Its Remedial Measures: Case Of Fentale Irrigation Project,” 2015. |
[22] | T. K. Kebede, “Assessment Of Design Practices And Performance Of Diversion Weir In Small Scale Irrigation (A Case Studies In Offiya Irrigation Project),” 2021. |
APA Style
Mosisa, G., Abebe, K., Wakena, Y. (2023). Hydrological Analysis and Peak Runoff Determination in Basaka River Sub-Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Using Gumbel’s and SCS Methods Respectively. Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science, 12(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11
ACS Style
Mosisa, G.; Abebe, K.; Wakena, Y. Hydrological Analysis and Peak Runoff Determination in Basaka River Sub-Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Using Gumbel’s and SCS Methods Respectively. J. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 2023, 12(2), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11
AMA Style
Mosisa G, Abebe K, Wakena Y. Hydrological Analysis and Peak Runoff Determination in Basaka River Sub-Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Using Gumbel’s and SCS Methods Respectively. J Water Resour Ocean Sci. 2023;12(2):23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11
@article{10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11, author = {Gemechu Mosisa and Kuma Abebe and Yadesa Wakena}, title = {Hydrological Analysis and Peak Runoff Determination in Basaka River Sub-Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Using Gumbel’s and SCS Methods Respectively}, journal = {Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science}, volume = {12}, number = {2}, pages = {23-30}, doi = {10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wros.20231202.11}, abstract = {Peak runoff determination is one of the most important studies for the design of hydraulic structures which is used for different purposes like irrigation, water supplies, hydropower, and bridge structure. The amount of runoff produced and rainfall received determine the development of water resources in any region. The purpose of hydrologic design is to estimate the maximum, average, or minimum flood that the structure is expected to handle. Hydrological analysis has been conducted based on 33 years of maximum daily rainfall data. An important step in the analysis of rainfall occurrence is to choose an appropriate distribution to represent the depth of rainfall to study rainfall. Nekemte meteorological station was used for maximum rainfall estimation by gumbles distribution method of 50 & 100 years return period which is 132 & 142mm; while for generation of peak runoff by using soil conservation service (SCS) method which is 238 & 263m3/s respectively for Basaka sub-watershed. Conversely, the SCS method is recommended to estimate the ordinate required for the development of peak runoff hydrograph in the river sub-watershed because it utilized additional morphometric parameters such as watershed slope and the curve number (CN) which is a function of the properties of the soil and vegetation cover of the watershed. Basaka sub-watershed delineation analysis was done by GIS 10.8 and it covers a drainage area of about 58km2. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Hydrological Analysis and Peak Runoff Determination in Basaka River Sub-Watershed, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia Using Gumbel’s and SCS Methods Respectively AU - Gemechu Mosisa AU - Kuma Abebe AU - Yadesa Wakena Y1 - 2023/11/11 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11 DO - 10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11 T2 - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JF - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JO - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science SP - 23 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7993 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20231202.11 AB - Peak runoff determination is one of the most important studies for the design of hydraulic structures which is used for different purposes like irrigation, water supplies, hydropower, and bridge structure. The amount of runoff produced and rainfall received determine the development of water resources in any region. The purpose of hydrologic design is to estimate the maximum, average, or minimum flood that the structure is expected to handle. Hydrological analysis has been conducted based on 33 years of maximum daily rainfall data. An important step in the analysis of rainfall occurrence is to choose an appropriate distribution to represent the depth of rainfall to study rainfall. Nekemte meteorological station was used for maximum rainfall estimation by gumbles distribution method of 50 & 100 years return period which is 132 & 142mm; while for generation of peak runoff by using soil conservation service (SCS) method which is 238 & 263m3/s respectively for Basaka sub-watershed. Conversely, the SCS method is recommended to estimate the ordinate required for the development of peak runoff hydrograph in the river sub-watershed because it utilized additional morphometric parameters such as watershed slope and the curve number (CN) which is a function of the properties of the soil and vegetation cover of the watershed. Basaka sub-watershed delineation analysis was done by GIS 10.8 and it covers a drainage area of about 58km2. VL - 12 IS - 2 ER -