The research explored Bangladeshi urban customers’ perception regarding the effectiveness of four different communication channels (Print media, TV, Radio, and social media) in terms of 16 attributes focusing convenience, relishing nature, dependency, and intrusiveness. Each of the platforms has its advantages and disadvantages. The findings revealed that social media is mostly used by consumers followed by TV and radio. It is found that print media (newspapers, magazines, etc.) still have their demand. The study noted that social media is convenient, enjoyable, pleasing and attention catching; also, the respondents found it informative, and information adequate. But they marked it as work disruptive, time killing, annoying, and objectionable. They also found it difficult to skip/ignore and not easy to reject. On the other hand, print media is found to be trustworthy, reliable, and quite informative. It is easy to reject and can easily retain messages, and not difficult to ignore. TV is found most entertaining, and to some extent enjoyable and accessible. The respondents also ranked it 2nd regarding work disruption, and time killer. Radio, on the other hand, found 2nd regarding annoyance and easy to reject.
| Published in | Innovation (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11 |
| Page(s) | 27-38 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Print Media, Radio, Social Media, Television, Rejection, Reliability, Trust, Conformance, Effectiveness
| [1] | Akter, M., & Sultana, N. (2020). Digital Marketing Communication and Consumer Buying Decision Process in Pandemic Standpoint (COVID-19): An Empirical Study of Bangladeshi Customers in Branded Cosmetics Perspective. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8(6), 2696-2715. |
| [2] | Barwise, T. P., & Strong, C. (2002). Permission-based mobile advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, Winter, 14-24. |
| [3] | Bednarz, J., & Orelly, P. (2020). The importance of social media on the FMCG market in Bangladesh. International Journal of Management and Economics, 56(3), 230-242. |
| [4] |
Belyh, A. (2020). Complete Comparison of the Major Marketing Channels. Cleverism.
https://www.cleverism.com/complete-comparison-major-marketing-channels/ |
| [5] | Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004). Television and web advertising synergies, Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 75-84. |
| [6] | Clow, E., & Baack, D. (2010). Marketing Management: A Customer-oriented Approach. ISBN 1412963125, 9781412963121, SAGE. |
| [7] | Danaher, Peter J., & Rossiter, J. R. (2011). Comparing perceptions of marketing communication channels. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 6-42. |
| [8] | Dijkstra, M., Buijtels, H., & van Raaij, W. F. (2005). Separate joint effects of medium type on Consumer responses: a comparison of television, print, and the internet, Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 377-86. |
| [9] | Eagle, L. (2004). Review of Shimp, T. A. (2003). Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(4), 289-290. |
| [10] | Edell, J. A., & Keller, K. L. (1989). The information processing of coordinated media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 149-63. |
| [11] | Katz, E., Gurevitc, M., & Haas, H. (1973). Use of Mass Media for Important Things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181. |
| [12] | Kazım, A. K., & Karahan, F. (2011). To Be or Not to Be in Social Media Arena as the Most Cost-Efficient Marketing Strategy after the Global Recession. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 24(13), 260-268. |
| [13] | Kitchen, P. J., & Schultz, D.E. (1999). A multi-country comparison of the drive for IMC. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(1), 21-38. |
| [14] | Kitchen, P. J., Brignell, J., Li, T., & Jones, S. G. (2004). The emergence of IMC: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(2), 19-30. |
| [15] |
La Monica, P. R. (2006). Cable Stealing Network TV’s Ad Thunder,
http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/22/news/companies/cable/cnn.com |
| [16] | Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society, in L. Bryson (Ed.). The communication of ideas, pp. 37-51. New York: Harper and Row. |
| [17] | Lesikar, R. V., Flatley, M. E., & Pettit, J. D. (1999). Lesikar's Basic Business Communication, Richard D Irwin. ISBN 10: 0072929901, ISBN 13: 9780072929904. |
| [18] | Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365, |
| [19] | Mihart, C. (2012). Impact of Integrated Marketing Communication on Consumer Behavior: Effects on Consumer Decision-Making Process. International Journal of Marketing Studies 4(2). |
| [20] | Naik, P. A., & Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 375-88. |
| [21] | Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2005). Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(3), 330-346. |
| [22] |
Rajagopal (2013). Managing Social Media and Consumerism: The Grapevine Effect in Competitive Markets. ISBN 978-1-349-44840-1, ISBN 978-1-137-28192-0 (eBook).
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137281920 UK: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. |
| [23] | Tiago, Maria Teresa Pinheiro Melo Borges & Veríssimo, José Manuel Cristóvão (2014). Digital marketing and social media: Why bother? Business Horizons, 57(6), 703-708, |
APA Style
Mamun, M. Z. (2025). Consumers’ Perceptions About Different Communication Channels in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. Innovation, 6(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11
ACS Style
Mamun, M. Z. Consumers’ Perceptions About Different Communication Channels in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. Innovation. 2025, 6(2), 27-38. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11
AMA Style
Mamun MZ. Consumers’ Perceptions About Different Communication Channels in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. Innovation. 2025;6(2):27-38. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11
@article{10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11,
author = {Muhammad Ziaulhaq Mamun},
title = {Consumers’ Perceptions About Different Communication Channels in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study
},
journal = {Innovation},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
pages = {27-38},
doi = {10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.innov.20250602.11},
abstract = {The research explored Bangladeshi urban customers’ perception regarding the effectiveness of four different communication channels (Print media, TV, Radio, and social media) in terms of 16 attributes focusing convenience, relishing nature, dependency, and intrusiveness. Each of the platforms has its advantages and disadvantages. The findings revealed that social media is mostly used by consumers followed by TV and radio. It is found that print media (newspapers, magazines, etc.) still have their demand. The study noted that social media is convenient, enjoyable, pleasing and attention catching; also, the respondents found it informative, and information adequate. But they marked it as work disruptive, time killing, annoying, and objectionable. They also found it difficult to skip/ignore and not easy to reject. On the other hand, print media is found to be trustworthy, reliable, and quite informative. It is easy to reject and can easily retain messages, and not difficult to ignore. TV is found most entertaining, and to some extent enjoyable and accessible. The respondents also ranked it 2nd regarding work disruption, and time killer. Radio, on the other hand, found 2nd regarding annoyance and easy to reject.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Consumers’ Perceptions About Different Communication Channels in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study AU - Muhammad Ziaulhaq Mamun Y1 - 2025/04/14 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11 DO - 10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11 T2 - Innovation JF - Innovation JO - Innovation SP - 27 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7138 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20250602.11 AB - The research explored Bangladeshi urban customers’ perception regarding the effectiveness of four different communication channels (Print media, TV, Radio, and social media) in terms of 16 attributes focusing convenience, relishing nature, dependency, and intrusiveness. Each of the platforms has its advantages and disadvantages. The findings revealed that social media is mostly used by consumers followed by TV and radio. It is found that print media (newspapers, magazines, etc.) still have their demand. The study noted that social media is convenient, enjoyable, pleasing and attention catching; also, the respondents found it informative, and information adequate. But they marked it as work disruptive, time killing, annoying, and objectionable. They also found it difficult to skip/ignore and not easy to reject. On the other hand, print media is found to be trustworthy, reliable, and quite informative. It is easy to reject and can easily retain messages, and not difficult to ignore. TV is found most entertaining, and to some extent enjoyable and accessible. The respondents also ranked it 2nd regarding work disruption, and time killer. Radio, on the other hand, found 2nd regarding annoyance and easy to reject. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -